Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (11)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Kloke, H.
Right arrow Articles by Huysmans, F.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Kloke, H.
Right arrow Articles by Huysmans, F.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Nephrology Dialysis Transplantation, Vol 13, Issue 3 646-650, Copyright © 1998 by Oxford University Press


ORIGINAL ARTICLES

Effects of low-dose nifedipine on urinary protein excretion rate in patients with renal disease

H Kloke, J Wetzels, R Koene and F Huysmans
Department of Medicine, Division of Nephrology, University Hospital, Geert Grooteplein 8, 6500 HB Nijmegen, The Netherlands; Corresponding author

Background: The observation that proteinuria is an important determinant of the progression of renal disease has prompted numerous studies on the effects of antihypertensive agents on protein excretion. Reports on the proteinuria effects of calcium-channel blockers are quite controversial. It has been suggested that the short-acting dihydropyridine calcium-channel blocker nifedipine increases protein excretion by interference with tubular protein reabsorption. Methods: In a randomized controlled trial 10 patients with renal disease and proteinuria were treated with a dose of 10 mg nifedipine o.d. (slow release formulation) for 1 week. The acute effects on renal and systemic haemodynamics and on urinary albumin, IgG, and {beta}2-microglobulin excretion were investigated during a clearance study in the supine position after the first dose. After 1 week of treatment urinary protein excretion rates were measured in 24-h urine samples collected in the ambulatory patient in consecutive fractions of 4-8 h during normal daily activities. Results: After the first dose nifedipine lowered mean arterial blood pressure in the supine position by 7±1 mmHg (<0.01), attenuated proximal tubular sodium reabsorption (fractional excretion of sodium 3.48±0.49 vs 2.62±0.35% during control, P<0.02), but did not affect proximal tubular protein reabsorption (fractional urinary excretion of {beta}2-microglobulin (0.97±0.30 vs 0.98±0.32% during control, NS). The decrease in blood pressure was not accompanied by decreases in urinary albumin or IgG excretion rates. The selectivity index as well as GFR, RPF, and FF did not change. Continued treatment for 1 week with nifedipine did not influence 24-h protein excretion. However, we observed a rise of proteinuria during daily activities in the first 4 h after drug intake compared to the start of the study with the patients in supine position. During nifedipine the increase in proteinuria was more marked and correlated with the selectivity index. Conclusions: (1) Nifedipine 10 mg orally did not impair tubular protein reabsorption. (2) Nifedipine had no immediate antiproteinuric effect despite the observed blood pressure reduction. (3) Nifedipine increased proteinuria in ambulatory urine collections. This latter observation might explain the seemingly different effects of dihydropyridine calcium-channel blockers as reported in previous studies. Key words: blood pressure; nifedipine; orthostasis; proteinuria; renal disease; selectivity
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.