Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (10)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Ponticelli, C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Ponticelli, C.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Nephrol Dial Transplant (2000) 15: 1307-1309
© 2000 European Renal Association-European Dialysis and Transplant Association


Personal Opinion

Calcineurin-inhibitors in renal transplantation. Too precious to be abandoned

Claudio Ponticelli

Division of Nephrology and Dialysis, IRCCS Ospedale Maggiore di Milano, Milan, Italy

Introduction

Drugs which inhibit the calcineurin enzymatic complex may be responsible for renal toxicity, which is occasionally progressive and irreversible. Thus, in spite of improving results obtained with the use of calcineurin inhibitors in the field of renal transplantation, many physicians are concerned about the long-term use of these agents and try to replace them sooner or later with non-nephrotoxic immunosuppressive agents such as azathioprine, mycophenolate mofetil, and/or rapamycin. Before this policy is generally adopted, however, one should consider the results that can be achieved today with the correct use of calcineurin inhibitors.

The main aims of modern immunosuppression are: (i) to minimize risk and outcome of acute rejection; (ii) to reduce the risk of comorbidity caused by immunosuppressive agents, particularly corticosteroids; and (iii) to reduce late graft failure caused by chronic rejection. All these goals may be achieved through administration of the calcineurin inhibitors, cyclosporin (CsA) or tacrolimus (FK) respectively, . . . [Full Text of this Article]

Acute rejection

Steroid-free immunosuppression

Late graft failures

Notes

References


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Nephrol Dial TransplantHome page
B. K. Kramer, G. Montagnino, D. del Castillo, R. Margreiter, H. Sperschneider, C. J. Olbricht, B. Kruger, J. Ortuno, H. Kohler, U. Kunzendorf, et al.
Efficacy and safety of tacrolimus compared with cyclosporin A microemulsion in renal transplantation: 2 year follow-up results
Nephrol. Dial. Transplant., May 1, 2005; 20(5): 968 - 973.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]